Technical Specifications

The National Active Mobility Bill establishes evidence-based infrastructure standards derived from international best practices and adapted for Indian urban contexts.

Pedestrian Infrastructure Standards

Minimum Footpath Width 2.0m clear width (3.0m in high-traffic areas)
Surface Material Slip-resistant, even, well-maintained
Gradient Maximum 1:12 (8.3%) for accessibility
Crossings Tactile paving, refuge islands, signal priority
Shade Coverage Tree canopy or structural shade every 50m
Lighting Minimum 20 lux at ground level

Based on IRC 103-2012, CROW Design Manual, and Singapore URA guidelines

Cycling Infrastructure Standards

Protected Lane Width 1.8m minimum (2.5m for bi-directional)
Physical Separation Concrete barrier, planter, or 0.5m buffer
Surface Quality Smooth asphalt, no potholes > 25mm
Intersection Treatment Protected signals, advanced stop boxes
Parking 1 secure space per 100m² near transit
Signage Lane markings every 50m, wayfinding at intersections

Based on NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide, CROW Fietsberaad standards

Research Methodology

Our recommendations are based on quantitative analysis of 14 global cities and peer-reviewed research.

Data Sources

  • 14 international cities (Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Paris, Barcelona, Singapore, Tokyo, etc.)
  • ITDP Protected Bicycle Lane Network Impact Model
  • CROW Fietsberaad (Netherlands Cycling Knowledge Centre)
  • NACTO Urban Street Design Guide
  • WHO Global Road Safety Reports
  • Indian MoRTH crash statistics (2020-2025)

Impact Calculation

CO₂ Reduction Formula:
CO₂ saved = (PKT shifted from cars × 120g/km) + (PKT from motorcycles × 80g/km) - (PKT by bicycle × 5g/km)

Health Benefits:
Based on Bogotá ratio: 300 deaths prevented per 500km of protected lanes (0.6 deaths/km)

Economic ROI:
Travel time savings + health benefits = 238% annual return

Key Metrics

  • Modal Share: % of trips by bicycle/walking
  • Infrastructure Density: km of protected lanes per 100k population
  • Investment per Capita: Annual spending on active mobility
  • Casualty Reduction: % decrease in pedestrian/cyclist deaths
  • Air Quality Index: PM2.5 and NO₂ changes

International Benchmarks

Comparative analysis of cities with successful active mobility policies

City Modal Share Infrastructure (km) Investment Key Legislation Year
Copenhagen 45% 380+ km DKK 1,600 per capita Traffic Law 1932, Municipal cycling policy 2014
Amsterdam 27% 400+ km (city) EUR 140 per capita CROW Fietsberaad standards 2020
Bogotá 8% 600 km ciclorrutas $130M (500km network) Urban Mobility Plan 2013-2018 2013
Singapore 1% 440 km (target: 1,000 km) SGD 1B over 10 years Active Mobility Act 2017 2017
Paris 5% Expanding during roadworks EUR 250M (2021-2026) Loi d'Orientation des Mobilités 2019 2019
Tokyo 14% National bike promotion plan JPY 6.1B (2024) Act on Promotion of Use of Bicycles 2026

View All 14 Cities

Download Resources

Technical documents, data, and implementation guides

National Active Mobility Bill 2026

Complete draft legislation with 77 defined terms, 19 chapters, institutional framework

Download DOCX

Karnataka Active Mobility Bill 2022

State-level draft bill that served as foundation for national legislation

Download PDF

ITDP Impact Model

Protected Bicycle Lane Network Impact Model - calculate CO₂, ROI, health benefits

Download Excel

City Comparison Data

14 international cities: modal share, investment, infrastructure, policies (JSON format)

View Interactive Table

Design Standards Reference

CROW Fietsberaad, NACTO, IRC 103-2012 guidelines summary

Request Access

Indian Cities Calculator

Estimate impact for Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Chennai, Hyderabad

Use Calculator

Key Research & Citations

Academic and policy sources informing the bill

  • CROW. (2016). Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic. Netherlands: CROW Fietsberaad.
  • NACTO. (2014). Urban Bikeway Design Guide. New York: National Association of City Transportation Officials.
  • IRC 103-2012. Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities. Indian Roads Congress.
  • Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2021). "Cycling through the COVID-19 Pandemic." Transport Reviews, 41(4), 393-396.

  • ITDP. (2022). Protected Bicycle Lane Network Impact Model. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy.
  • WHO. (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. World Health Organization.
  • Götschi, T., et al. (2016). "Contrasts in Active Transport Behaviour across Four Countries." Transport Policy, 45, 177-185.
  • Mueller, N., et al. (2018). "Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities." Preventive Medicine, 109, 62-70.

  • Fast Company. (2022). "Protected bike lanes can help cities cut emissions: Bogotá's $130 million investment proves it." Link
  • Cavill, N., et al. (2008). "Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking." Transport Policy, 15(5), 291-304.
  • ECF. (2018). EU Cycling Strategy: Recommendations for Delivering Green Growth and an Effective Mobility System in 2030. European Cyclists' Federation.

  • Singapore. (2017). Active Mobility Act 2017. Parliament of Singapore.
  • France. (2019). Loi d'Orientation des Mobilités (LOM). French Parliament.
  • Denmark. (1932/2022). Traffic Law & National Cycling Strategy. Danish Road Directorate.
  • Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2008). "Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany." Transport Reviews, 28(4), 495-528.

Chat with Technical Experts

Join the conversation right here - no Discord account needed!

Join the Expert Community
Loading...

Connect with technical experts, urban planners, and infrastructure designers. Discuss research, share data, and analyze policies for safer active mobility.

Loading channels...
#expert-planning

Technical discussions and research

Infrastructure Design

Share detailed planning insights

Policy Analysis

Review and critique legislation

150+ Experts

Engineers, planners, researchers

Join Discord Server

Free to join • Available on mobile & desktop

Contribute Your Expertise

We welcome input from urban planners, researchers, and sector experts to refine the bill and implementation guidelines.

Connect with transportation planners, civil engineers, policy analysts, and researchers from across India